Settings as gear icon
SIGN IN
Info
About · Methodology · Help · Version · Install app
Legal
Terms · Privacy · DMCA
© 2026 Feels Co.

MyLegacy™ by LINGA – Immortality Awaits™

Hand pointing up icon Summary & key points

MyLegacy™ from LINGA allows you to communicate with friends, peers, and loved ones post mortem. MyLegacy™ preserves your communication likeness in the form-factor of a Natural Grammar Clone™ that you can choose to make available to the public. This remarkable product is made possible via our Linguistic Fingerprint™ technology.
Feels in
Comments icon LINGA – Our business is language itself™ headshot

Mister Terrific corrects Lois Lane: "They're not circles. Circles are flat"

Hand pointing up icon Summary & key points

Mister Terrific does not understand why Lois thinks his spheres are circles.
Feels in
Comments icon Michael Holt headshot

Blondie's potential mate in Heart of Glass soon turned out to be a "pain in the a**"

Hand pointing up icon Summary & key points

In rock band Blondie's 1978 hit single called Heart of Glass, the lyrics tell us about the potential disappointment of romance. The entire song features a single example of colorful language: "... soon turned out to be a pain in the a**." This limited, tame use of colorful language exemplifies the Formality attribute.
Feels in
Comments icon Blondie headshot

GREAT Jordan Belfort takes 2 minutes to adapt his language/behavior to Wall St.

Hand pointing up icon Summary & key points

In the hit movie The Wolf of Wall Street (2013), future successful financer Jordan Belfort is starting out on his first day of work as a broker on Wall Street. His boss takes him out to lunch and proceeds to take several drugs and order lots of alcoholic beverages in the work day. When Jordan questions his boss about this, he soon discovers that the culture of Wall Street includes such behavior, and many others. This alters Jordan's perspective on how things really work on Wall Street. Jordan's initial inability to adapt his speech and behavior with respect to Formality, Emotion, and other attributes highlight a well-below average score of Apperception.
Feels in
Comments icon Jordan Ross Belfort headshot
Carrie's walk and outfit through NYC gets ruined by water

Carrie's walk and outfit through NYC gets ruined by water

Hand pointing up icon Summary & key points

Carrie Bradshaw is walking through New York City and plotting her next move right before a car passing by splashes her with water.
Comments icon Caroline Marie Bradshaw headshot

Boxer answers "I'm feel" after becoming world champion

Hand pointing up icon Summary & key points

In 2001, Ukrainian boxer Oleksandr Usyk won a championship and, when asked how he felt, responded with the unusual phrase "I'm feel. I'm very feel." This use of "feel" as a noun emphasizes the Sensation attribute, indicating an overwhelming state of bodily-sensory perception after becoming heavyweight champion.
Feels in

Block quote icon Transcript

Follow along using the transcript below or move to side panel.

Showing transcript on side panel. Move transcript here.

0:00
Felicia @ Feels
I'm feel. I'm very feel.
0:06
Felicia @ Feels
In 2001, Ukrainian professional boxer Oleksandr Usyk won a contest against a rival opponent and proceeded to give an interview.
0:13
Felicia @ Feels
When asked how he felt about becoming the world champion, Usyk said, "I'm feel. I'm very feel."
0:18
Felicia @ Feels
Words like "feel" represent the Sensation attribute, and Usyk's uncommon use of the verb "to feel" as a noun represents a form of emphasis.
0:24
Felicia @ Feels
That's why Usyk's language reflects an Ultra-High Sensation score.
0:28
Felicia @ Feels
Here's the full clip.
0:29
Felicia @ Feels
Oleksandr, how do you feel? Heavyweight champion of the world.
0:34
Felicia @ Feels
I'm feel. I'm very feel.
0:38
Felicia @ Feels
What's that?
0:39
Felicia @ Feels
Heavyweight champions.

FeelsMap logo as chart diagram icon FeelsMap

See the logical linguistic relationships in this Feel.

FeelsMap
Comments icon Oleksandr Oleksandrovych Usyk headshot
  • © Linguistic Innovations Natural Grammar Applications Co. dba Feels Co. All rights reserved. 2810 N Church St, #790324, Wilmington, DE 19802 US

Ultra Low

0–5% percentile
An ultra low attribute score is exceptionally rare because it represents 5% of the entire population. In a room with 100 other people, a person with an ultra low attribute score would be lower than 95 of them and higher than none of them.
Note: Feels uses a 9-point scoring scale that ranges from Ultra Low to Ultra High according to a normal distribution. See our methodology.

Very Low

5–10% percentile
A very low attribute score is rare because it represents 5% of the entire population. In a room with 100 other people, a person with a very low attribute score would be higher than five of them and lower than 90 of them.
Note: Feels uses a 9-point scoring scale that ranges from Ultra Low to Ultra High according to a normal distribution. See our methodology.

Low

10–20% percentile
A low attribute score is somewhat uncommon and represents 10% of the entire population. In a room with 100 other people, a person with a low attribute score would be higher than ten of them and lower than 80 of them.
Note: Feels uses a 9-point scoring scale that ranges from Ultra Low to Ultra High according to a normal distribution. See our methodology.

Slightly Low

20–40% percentile
A slightly low attribute score is common and represents 20% of the entire population. In a room with 100 other people, a person with a slightly low attribute score would be higher than 20 of them and lower than 60 of them.
Note: Feels uses a 9-point scoring scale that ranges from Ultra Low to Ultra High according to a normal distribution. See our methodology.

Average

40–60% percentile
An average attribute score is typical and represents 20% of the entire population. In a room with 100 other people, a person with an average attribute score would be higher than 40 of them and lower than 40 of them.
Note: Feels uses a 9-point scoring scale that ranges from Ultra Low to Ultra High according to a normal distribution. See our methodology.

Slightly High

60–80% percentile
A slightly high attribute score is common and represents 20% of the entire population. In a room with 100 other people, a person with a slightly high attribute score would be higher than 60 of them and lower than 20 of them.
Note: Feels uses a 9-point scoring scale that ranges from Ultra Low to Ultra High according to a normal distribution. See our methodology.

High

80–90% percentile
A high attribute score is somewhat uncommon and represents 10% of the entire population. In a room with 100 other people, a person with a high attribute score would be higher than 80 of them and lower than 10 of them.
Note: Feels uses a 9-point scoring scale that ranges from Ultra Low to Ultra High according to a normal distribution. See our methodology.

Very High

90–95% percentile
A very high attribute score is rare because it represents 5% of the entire population. In a room with 100 other people, a person with a very high attribute score would be higher than 90 of them and lower than five of them.
Note: Feels uses a 9-point scoring scale that ranges from Ultra Low to Ultra High according to a normal distribution. See our methodology.

Ultra High

95–100% percentile
An ultra high attribute score is exceptionally rare because it represents 5% of the entire population. In a room with 100 other people, a person with an ultra high attribute score would be higher than 95 of them and lower than none of them.
Note: Feels uses a 9-point scoring scale that ranges from Ultra Low to Ultra High according to a normal distribution. See our methodology.