In the hit movie The Wolf of Wall Street (2013), successful financer Jordan Belfort finds himself on his own boat being visited by FBI agents for financial crimes of a criminal nature. Very serious. He cordially invites them up to his boat and engages in 15 minutes of conversation warm up before the two agents and the focused-eyed Belfort begin to talk about brass tax. Belfort suggests, in so few words, that he is willing to do anything within his power to make peoples' lives better, including applying his experience and money. The FBI agent interprets this as a clear bribe, and breaks protocol by asking Jordan to repeat it again because he believes that Jordan has incriminated himself terribly. Comedic dialogue proceeds thereafter. Belfort’s knowledge of the law seemingly influenced his lack of details for how the crime would work in a logistical manner, which would constitute evidence of committing a bribery crime. Belfort's selective word choices intended to dilute clarity in order to avoid self-incrimination demonstrate communication well below average in the Specificity attribute.
In 1998, the Department of Justice sued Microsoft for antitrust violations. Bill Gates, the founder and leader of the company, had to testify. In widely circulated videos, Gates is shown evading some questions on the grounds that he does not understand. The lawyer tried to corner Gates on many occasions, without success.
Popular children's television show host and producer testified before congress in 1969 in order to secure funding for public broadcasting. After only six minutes of speaking, Mister Rogers secured twenty million dollars in his party's favor. Everyone present understood the nature and importance of Roger's work alongside its impact on both young children and the future of America.
In the first season of the hit show The Summer I Turned Pretty (2022), Isabel "Belly" Conklin discovers what happens when she gets attention from boys around her. In this clip, Belly is at a convenience store snacking when she notices the clerk admiring her from afar. She seems to feel both surprised and flattered.
An ultra low attribute score is exceptionally rare because it represents 5% of the entire population. In a room with 100 other people, a person with an ultra low attribute score would be lower than 95 of them and higher than none of them.
Note: Feels uses a 9-point scoring scale that ranges from Ultra Low to Ultra High according to a normal distribution. See our methodology.
Very Low
5–10% percentile
A very low attribute score is rare because it represents 5% of the entire population. In a room with 100 other people, a person with a very low attribute score would be higher than five of them and lower than 90 of them.
Note: Feels uses a 9-point scoring scale that ranges from Ultra Low to Ultra High according to a normal distribution. See our methodology.
Low
10–20% percentile
A low attribute score is somewhat uncommon and represents 10% of the entire population. In a room with 100 other people, a person with a low attribute score would be higher than ten of them and lower than 80 of them.
Note: Feels uses a 9-point scoring scale that ranges from Ultra Low to Ultra High according to a normal distribution. See our methodology.
Slightly Low
20–40% percentile
A slightly low attribute score is common and represents 20% of the entire population. In a room with 100 other people, a person with a slightly low attribute score would be higher than 20 of them and lower than 60 of them.
Note: Feels uses a 9-point scoring scale that ranges from Ultra Low to Ultra High according to a normal distribution. See our methodology.
Average
40–60% percentile
An average attribute score is typical and represents 20% of the entire population. In a room with 100 other people, a person with an average attribute score would be higher than 40 of them and lower than 40 of them.
Note: Feels uses a 9-point scoring scale that ranges from Ultra Low to Ultra High according to a normal distribution. See our methodology.
Slightly High
60–80% percentile
A slightly high attribute score is common and represents 20% of the entire population. In a room with 100 other people, a person with a slightly high attribute score would be higher than 60 of them and lower than 20 of them.
Note: Feels uses a 9-point scoring scale that ranges from Ultra Low to Ultra High according to a normal distribution. See our methodology.
High
80–90% percentile
A high attribute score is somewhat uncommon and represents 10% of the entire population. In a room with 100 other people, a person with a high attribute score would be higher than 80 of them and lower than 10 of them.
Note: Feels uses a 9-point scoring scale that ranges from Ultra Low to Ultra High according to a normal distribution. See our methodology.
Very High
90–95% percentile
A very high attribute score is rare because it represents 5% of the entire population. In a room with 100 other people, a person with a very high attribute score would be higher than 90 of them and lower than five of them.
Note: Feels uses a 9-point scoring scale that ranges from Ultra Low to Ultra High according to a normal distribution. See our methodology.
Ultra High
95–100% percentile
An ultra high attribute score is exceptionally rare because it represents 5% of the entire population. In a room with 100 other people, a person with an ultra high attribute score would be higher than 95 of them and lower than none of them.
Note: Feels uses a 9-point scoring scale that ranges from Ultra Low to Ultra High according to a normal distribution. See our methodology.